Alternatives to MaxCDN logo

Alternatives to MaxCDN

CloudFlare, KeyCDN, Amazon CloudFront, Fastly, and Akamai are the most popular alternatives and competitors to MaxCDN.
1.6K
554
+ 1
100

What is MaxCDN and what are its top alternatives?

The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them.
MaxCDN is a tool in the Content Delivery Network category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to MaxCDN

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • KeyCDN
    KeyCDN

    KeyCDN offers super fast and secure content delivery for minimal loading time. In addition to the CDN, it also offers advanced image processing and many other features such as live logs and Let's Encrypt SSL. ...

  • Amazon CloudFront
    Amazon CloudFront

    Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. ...

  • Fastly
    Fastly

    Fastly's real-time content delivery network gives you total control over your content, unprecedented access to performance analytics, and the ability to instantly update content in 150 milliseconds. ...

  • Akamai
    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

  • StackPath
    StackPath

    Build your applications and services at the edge, with Edge Computing and Edge Services that give you high performance, full security, and total control. ...

  • cdnjs
    cdnjs

    Everyone loves the Google CDN? Even Microsoft runs their own CDN. The problem is, they only host the most popular libraries. We host it all - JavaScript, CSS, SWF, images, etc! Powered by CloudFlare. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

MaxCDN alternatives & related posts

CloudFlare logo

CloudFlare

75.9K
22.1K
1.8K
The Web Performance & Security Company.
75.9K
22.1K
+ 1
1.8K
PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
  • 424
    Easy setup, great cdn
  • 277
    Free ssl
  • 199
    Easy setup
  • 190
    Security
  • 180
    Ssl
  • 98
    Great cdn
  • 77
    Optimizer
  • 71
    Simple
  • 44
    Great UI
  • 28
    Great js cdn
  • 12
    Apps
  • 12
    HTTP/2 Support
  • 12
    DNS Analytics
  • 12
    AutoMinify
  • 9
    Rocket Loader
  • 9
    Ipv6
  • 9
    Easy
  • 8
    IPv6 "One Click"
  • 8
    Fantastic CDN service
  • 7
    DNSSEC
  • 7
    Nice DNS
  • 7
    SSHFP
  • 7
    Free GeoIP
  • 7
    Amazing performance
  • 7
    API
  • 7
    Cheapest SSL
  • 6
    SPDY
  • 6
    Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
  • 5
    Ubuntu
  • 5
    Asynchronous resource loading
  • 4
    Global Load Balancing
  • 4
    Performance
  • 4
    Easy Use
  • 3
    CDN
  • 2
    Registrar
  • 2
    Support for SSHFP records
  • 1
    Web3
  • 1
    Прохси
  • 1
    HTTPS3/Quic
CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
  • 2
    No support for SSHFP records
  • 2
    Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

related CloudFlare posts

Eugene Cheah

For inboxkitten.com, an opensource disposable email service;

We migrated our serverless workload from Cloud Functions for Firebase to CloudFlare workers, taking advantage of the lower cost and faster-performing edge computing of Cloudflare network. Made possible due to our extremely low CPU and RAM overhead of our serverless functions.

If I were to summarize the limitation of Cloudflare (as oppose to firebase/gcp functions), it would be ...

  1. <5ms CPU time limit
  2. Incompatible with express.js
  3. one script limitation per domain

Limitations our workload is able to conform with (YMMV)

For hosting of static files, we migrated from Firebase to CommonsHost

More details on the trade-off in between both serverless providers is in the article

See more
CDG

I use Laravel because it's the most advances PHP framework out there, easy to maintain, easy to upgrade and most of all : easy to get a handle on, and to follow every new technology ! PhpStorm is our main software to code, as of simplicity and full range of tools for a modern application.

Google Analytics Analytics of course for a tailored analytics, Bulma as an innovative CSS framework, coupled with our Sass (Scss) pre-processor.

As of more basic stuff, we use HTML5, JavaScript (but with Vue.js too) and Webpack to handle the generation of all this.

To deploy, we set up Buddy to easily send the updates on our nginx / Ubuntu server, where it will connect to our GitHub Git private repository, pull and do all the operations needed with Deployer .

CloudFlare ensure the rapidity of distribution of our content, and Let's Encrypt the https certificate that is more than necessary when we'll want to sell some products with our Stripe api calls.

Asana is here to let us list all the functionalities, possibilities and ideas we want to implement.

See more
KeyCDN logo

KeyCDN

142
142
279
High performance CDN with powerful image processing!
142
142
+ 1
279
PROS OF KEYCDN
  • 40
    Pay-as-you-go
  • 38
    Cheapest cdn pricing ever
  • 27
    Easy setup
  • 27
    No subscription
  • 23
    Free shared ssl
  • 21
    Fastest cdn i've ever used
  • 17
    Cheap
  • 16
    Ssd-optimized edge servers
  • 15
    Great support
  • 14
    Quick support
  • 7
    Free Custom SSL
  • 5
    Supports HTTP/2 and available globally
  • 4
    No time limit for spending credit
  • 3
    Build for developers
  • 3
    Support Let's Encrypt
  • 2
    Supports SPDY
  • 2
    Server from Turkey
  • 2
    5 zones included
  • 2
    Easy as pie to setup
  • 2
    Brotli Support
  • 2
    No credit card required for free trial
  • 2
    Real-time Log Forwarding
  • 1
    Fastest CDN
  • 1
    Easy to setup & improve website loading speed
  • 1
    Haven't had much time to tinker, but YES
  • 1
    Its very reliable and easy to use
  • 1
    Great customer support, easy setup
  • 0
    A very capable CDN with an affordable price tag
CONS OF KEYCDN
    Be the first to leave a con

    related KeyCDN posts

    Mountain/ \Ash

    Platform Update: we’ve been using the Performance Test tool provided by KeyCDN for a long time in combination with Pingdom's similar tool and the #WebpageTest and #GoogleInsight - we decided to test out KeyCDN for static asset hosting. The results for the endpoints were superfast - almost 200% faster than CloudFlare in some tests and 370% faster than imgix . So we’ve moved Washington Brown from imgix for hosting theme images, to KeyCDN for hosting all images and static assets (Font, CSS & JS). There’s a few things that we like about “Key” apart from saving $6 a month on the monthly minimum spend ($4 vs $10 for imgix). Key allow for a custom CNAME (no more advertising imgix.com in domain requests and possible SEO improvements - and easier to swap to another host down the track). Key allows JPEG/WebP image requests based on clients ‘accept’ http headers - imgix required a ?auto=format query string on each image resource request - which can break some caches. Key allows for explicitly denying cookies to be set on a zone/domain; cookies are a big strain on limited upload bandwidth so to be able to force these off is great - Cloudflare adds a cookie to every header… for “performance reasons”… but remember “if you’re getting a product something for free…”

    See more
    Amazon CloudFront logo

    Amazon CloudFront

    21.1K
    10.6K
    935
    Content delivery with low latency and high data transfer speeds
    21.1K
    10.6K
    + 1
    935
    PROS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
    • 245
      Fast
    • 166
      Cdn
    • 157
      Compatible with other aws services
    • 125
      Simple
    • 108
      Global
    • 41
      Cheap
    • 36
      Cost-effective
    • 27
      Reliable
    • 19
      One stop solution
    • 9
      Elastic
    • 1
      Object store
    • 1
      HTTP/2 Support
    CONS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
    • 3
      UI could use some work
    • 1
      Invalidations take so long

    related Amazon CloudFront posts

    Russel Werner
    Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.2M views

    StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

    Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

    #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

    See more
    Julien DeFrance
    Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 3.1M views

    Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

    I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

    For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

    Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

    Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

    Future improvements / technology decisions included:

    Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

    As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

    One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

    See more
    Fastly logo

    Fastly

    1.1K
    502
    153
    We're redefining content delivery.
    1.1K
    502
    + 1
    153
    PROS OF FASTLY
    • 28
      Real-time updates
    • 26
      Fastest CDN
    • 22
      Powerful API
    • 20
      Great support
    • 14
      Great customer support
    • 7
      Instant Purging
    • 7
      Custom VCL
    • 6
      Good pricing
    • 6
      Tag-based Purging
    • 5
      HTTP/2 Support
    • 4
      Speed & functionality
    • 4
      Image processing on demande (Fastly IO)
    • 4
      Best CDN
    CONS OF FASTLY
    • 1
      Minimum $50/mo spend

    related Fastly posts

    Paul Whittemore
    Developer and Owner at Appurist Software · | 15 upvotes · 1.1M views

    I'm building most projects using: Server: either Fastify (all projects going forward) or ExpressJS on Node.js (existing, previously) on the server side, and Client app: either Vuetify (currently) or Quasar Framework (going forward) on Vue.js with vuex on Electron for the UI to deliver both web-based and desktop applications for multiple platforms.

    The direct support for Android and iOS in Quasar Framework will make it my go-to client UI platform for any new client-side or web work. On the server, I'll probably use Fastly for all my server work, unless I get into Go more in the future.

    Update: The mobile support in Quasar is not a sufficiently compelling reason to move me from Vuetify. I have decided to stick with Vuetify for a UI for Vue, as it is richer in components and enables a really great-looking professional result. For mobile platforms, I will just use Cordova to wrap the Vue+Vuetify app for mobile, and Electron to wrap it for desktop platforms.

    See more
    Justin Dorfman
    Open Source Program Manager at Reblaze · | 4 upvotes · 235.3K views

    When my SSL cert MaxCDN was expiring on my personal site I decided it was a good time to revamp some things. Since GitHub Services is depreciated I can no longer have #CDN cache purges automated among other things. So I decided on the following: GitHub Pages, Netlify, Let's Encrypt and Jekyll. Staying the same was Bootstrap, jQuery, Grunt & #GoogleFonts.

    What's awesome about GitHub Pages is that it has a #CDN (Fastly) built-in and anytime you push to master, it purges the cache instantaneously without you have to do anything special. Netlify is magic, I highly recommend it to anyone using #StaticSiteGenerators.

    For the most part, everything went smoothly. The only things I had issues with were the following:

    • If you want to point www to GitHub Pages you need to rename the repo to www
    • If you edit something in the _config.yml you need to restart bundle exec jekyll s or changes won't show
    • I had to disable the Grunt htmlmin module. I replaced it with Jekyll layout that compresses HTML for #webperf

    Last but certainly not least, I made a donation to Let's Encrypt. If you use their service consider doing it too: https://letsencrypt.org/donate/

    See more
    Akamai logo

    Akamai

    1.9K
    434
    0
    The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
    1.9K
    434
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF AKAMAI
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF AKAMAI
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Akamai posts

        StackPath logo

        StackPath

        31
        46
        1
        Secure Edge Platform for Developers
        31
        46
        + 1
        1
        PROS OF STACKPATH
        • 1
          Supports the open source community
        • 0
          Easy DO-like setup, but with edge performance
        CONS OF STACKPATH
          Be the first to leave a con

          related StackPath posts

          cdnjs logo

          cdnjs

          100
          115
          11
          An open source community driven Javascript CDN
          100
          115
          + 1
          11
          PROS OF CDNJS
          • 4
            Fast
          • 3
            Free
          • 2
            Easy Interface
          • 1
            Largest user base
          • 1
            Most number of libraries
          CONS OF CDNJS
            Be the first to leave a con

            related cdnjs posts

            JavaScript logo

            JavaScript

            351K
            267.2K
            8.1K
            Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
            351K
            267.2K
            + 1
            8.1K
            PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
            • 1.7K
              Can be used on frontend/backend
            • 1.5K
              It's everywhere
            • 1.2K
              Lots of great frameworks
            • 896
              Fast
            • 745
              Light weight
            • 425
              Flexible
            • 392
              You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
            • 286
              Non-blocking i/o
            • 236
              Ubiquitousness
            • 191
              Expressive
            • 55
              Extended functionality to web pages
            • 49
              Relatively easy language
            • 46
              Executed on the client side
            • 30
              Relatively fast to the end user
            • 25
              Pure Javascript
            • 21
              Functional programming
            • 15
              Async
            • 13
              Full-stack
            • 12
              Setup is easy
            • 12
              Its everywhere
            • 12
              Future Language of The Web
            • 11
              JavaScript is the New PHP
            • 11
              Because I love functions
            • 10
              Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
            • 9
              Expansive community
            • 9
              Everyone use it
            • 9
              Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
            • 9
              Easy
            • 8
              Easy to hire developers
            • 8
              No need to use PHP
            • 8
              For the good parts
            • 8
              Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
            • 8
              Powerful
            • 8
              Most Popular Language in the World
            • 7
              Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
            • 7
              It's fun
            • 7
              Nice
            • 7
              Versitile
            • 7
              Hard not to use
            • 7
              Its fun and fast
            • 7
              Agile, packages simple to use
            • 7
              Supports lambdas and closures
            • 7
              Love-hate relationship
            • 7
              Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
            • 7
              Evolution of C
            • 6
              1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
            • 6
              Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
            • 6
              It let's me use Babel & Typescript
            • 6
              Easy to make something
            • 6
              Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
            • 5
              Promise relationship
            • 5
              Stockholm Syndrome
            • 5
              Function expressions are useful for callbacks
            • 5
              Scope manipulation
            • 5
              Everywhere
            • 5
              Client processing
            • 5
              Clojurescript
            • 5
              What to add
            • 4
              Because it is so simple and lightweight
            • 4
              Only Programming language on browser
            • 1
              Test2
            • 1
              Easy to learn
            • 1
              Easy to understand
            • 1
              Not the best
            • 1
              Hard to learn
            • 1
              Subskill #4
            • 1
              Test
            • 0
              Hard 彤
            CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
            • 22
              A constant moving target, too much churn
            • 20
              Horribly inconsistent
            • 15
              Javascript is the New PHP
            • 9
              No ability to monitor memory utilitization
            • 8
              Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
            • 7
              Thinks strange results are better than errors
            • 6
              Can be ugly
            • 3
              No GitHub
            • 2
              Slow

            related JavaScript posts

            Zach Holman

            Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

            But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

            But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

            Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

            See more
            Conor Myhrvold
            Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 10.1M views

            How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

            Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

            Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

            https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

            (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

            Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

            See more