Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS CodeStar

25
171
+ 1
8
GitLab

60.7K
52K
+ 1
2.5K
Add tool

AWS CodeStar vs GitLab: What are the differences?

AWS CodeStar vs GitLab

AWS CodeStar and GitLab are two popular platforms used by developers for code hosting, collaboration, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) purposes. While both platforms offer similar functionalities, there are several key differences between AWS CodeStar and GitLab that developers should consider when choosing a platform for their development needs.

  1. Integration with AWS Services: One major difference between AWS CodeStar and GitLab is the deep integration with other AWS services offered by CodeStar. AWS CodeStar provides seamless integration with various AWS services such as AWS Lambda, AWS Elastic Beanstalk, AWS CodeCommit, and AWS CodePipeline. This integration allows developers to easily leverage these services to build, test, and deploy applications directly from the CodeStar platform. On the other hand, GitLab is more agnostic and can be used with various cloud providers, but it doesn't have the same level of AWS-specific integrations.

  2. Hosted vs Self-hosted: Another key difference between AWS CodeStar and GitLab is the hosting aspect. AWS CodeStar is a fully-managed service provided by AWS, which means that AWS takes care of the underlying infrastructure and maintenance tasks. This can be beneficial for developers who prefer a fully-managed solution and don't want to worry about infrastructure management. On the contrary, GitLab can be self-hosted, allowing developers to have more control over the infrastructure and customization options. This self-hosted feature can be advantageous for companies that require on-premises hosting or have specific security or compliance requirements.

  3. Pricing Model: AWS CodeStar has a pricing model based on the usage of AWS services and resources used within its platform. This means that the cost of using AWS CodeStar is directly tied to the usage of underlying AWS services like compute instances, storage, and data transfer. In contrast, GitLab provides a flexible pricing model, allowing users to choose between a self-managed version (Community Edition) or a hosted version (GitLab.com) with subscription plans based on the number of users. This flexibility provides more options for developers based on their budget and specific needs.

  4. Development Ecosystem: AWS CodeStar is part of the larger AWS ecosystem, providing developers with access to a wide range of AWS tools and services. This ecosystem includes services like AWS CloudFormation for infrastructure management, AWS CodeCommit for version control, and AWS CodePipeline for CI/CD pipelines. These integrations can streamline the development process for AWS-based projects. In contrast, GitLab has its own ecosystem, with features such as GitLab CI/CD, issue tracking, and project management tools integrated into a single platform. GitLab also has a large community of developers and a marketplace for additional integrations and extensions.

  5. Scalability and Performance: AWS CodeStar is built on top of AWS's global infrastructure, which offers high availability, scalability, and performance. AWS CodeStar leverages AWS services like Amazon EC2 for compute resources, Amazon S3 for storage, and Amazon RDS for database management. This infrastructure allows developers to scale their applications and handle high traffic loads effectively. GitLab, on the other hand, relies on the infrastructure chosen by the user, whether it's self-hosted or a cloud provider. While it can be scaled to handle large projects, the performance and scalability of GitLab can depend on the choice of infrastructure and its resources.

  6. Community and Support: GitLab has a large and active community of developers, with many open-source projects and resources available. The GitLab community provides support, documentation, and continuous improvement of the GitLab platform. Additionally, GitLab offers various support options for enterprise users, including priority support services, and access to GitLab's professional services team. AWS CodeStar also benefits from the larger AWS community and support network, with extensive documentation, online forums, and access to AWS support services.

In summary, AWS CodeStar offers deep integration with AWS services, is a fully-managed solution, has a usage-based pricing model, and is part of the larger AWS ecosystem. On the other hand, GitLab provides more hosting flexibility, has a customizable pricing model, has its own ecosystem, relies on the infrastructure chosen by the user, and has an active community of developers.

Decisions about AWS CodeStar and GitLab
Weverton Timoteo

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

See more
Kamaleshwar BN
Senior Software Engineer at Pulley · | 8 upvotes · 666.1K views

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

See more

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

See more
Nazar Atamaniuk
Shared insights
on
DeployPlaceDeployPlaceGitHubGitHubGitLabGitLab

At DeployPlace we use self-hosted GitLab, we have chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AWS CodeStar
Pros of GitLab
  • 3
    Simple to set up
  • 2
    Manual Steps Available
  • 1
    Flexible
  • 1
    Integrations
  • 1
    GitHub integration
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 430
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
  • 137
    Includes many features, including ci
  • 113
    Nice UI
  • 84
    Good integration with gitlabci
  • 57
    Simple setup
  • 34
    Free private repository
  • 34
    Has an official mobile app
  • 31
    Continuous Integration
  • 22
    Open source, great ui (like github)
  • 18
    Slack Integration
  • 14
    Full CI flow
  • 11
    Free and unlimited private git repos
  • 10
    User, group, and project access management is simple
  • 9
    All in one (Git, CI, Agile..)
  • 8
    Built-in CI
  • 8
    Intuitive UI
  • 6
    Both public and private Repositories
  • 6
    Full DevOps suite with Git
  • 5
    Build/pipeline definition alongside code
  • 5
    CI
  • 5
    So easy to use
  • 5
    Integrated Docker Registry
  • 5
    It's powerful source code management tool
  • 4
    Issue system
  • 4
    Dockerized
  • 4
    Unlimited free repos & collaborators
  • 4
    Security and Stable
  • 4
    On-premises
  • 4
    It's fully integrated
  • 4
    Mattermost Chat client
  • 4
    Excellent
  • 3
    Great for team collaboration
  • 3
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 3
    Low maintenance cost due omnibus-deployment
  • 3
    I like the its runners and executors feature
  • 3
    Free private repos
  • 3
    Because is the best remote host for git repositories
  • 3
    Not Microsoft Owned
  • 3
    Opensource
  • 2
    Groups of groups
  • 2
    Powerful software planning and maintaining tools
  • 2
    Review Apps feature
  • 2
    Kubernetes integration with GitLab CI
  • 2
    It includes everything I need, all packaged with docker
  • 2
    Multilingual interface
  • 2
    HipChat intergration
  • 2
    Powerful Continuous Integration System
  • 2
    One-click install through DigitalOcean
  • 2
    The dashboard with deployed environments
  • 2
    Native CI
  • 2
    Many private repo
  • 2
    Kubernetes Integration
  • 2
    Published IP list for whitelisting (gl-infra#434)
  • 2
    Wounderful
  • 2
    Beautiful
  • 1
    Supports Radius/Ldap & Browser Code Edits

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AWS CodeStar
Cons of GitLab
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 28
      Slow ui performance
    • 8
      Introduce breaking bugs every release
    • 6
      Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
    • 2
      Built-in Docker Registry
    • 1
      Review Apps feature

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is AWS CodeStar?

    Start new software projects on AWS in minutes using templates for web applications, web services and more.

    What is GitLab?

    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use AWS CodeStar?
    What companies use GitLab?
    See which teams inside your own company are using AWS CodeStar or GitLab.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with AWS CodeStar?
    What tools integrate with GitLab?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to AWS CodeStar and GitLab?
    Jenkins
    In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
    Heroku
    Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
    AWS CodeCommit
    CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
    AWS CodePipeline
    CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.
    Azure DevOps
    Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.
    See all alternatives