Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Backendless vs Firebase: What are the differences?
Scalability: One key difference between Backendless and Firebase is their scalability. Backendless offers automatic scaling of applications, meaning that as the app usage increases, the backend infrastructure automatically adjusts to handle the load. It can handle high traffic and large data sets without requiring manual intervention. On the other hand, Firebase also supports automatic scaling, but it has some limitations when it comes to handling large data sets or high traffic applications. It may require additional configuration or manual intervention to handle scalability issues.
Backend Development: Another difference between Backendless and Firebase is the level of control in backend development. Backendless allows developers to write server-side code in various programming languages, giving them more flexibility and control over the backend logic. It also provides features like custom business logic, API services, and event-driven serverless functions. In contrast, Firebase mainly focuses on serverless architecture, where developers write client-side code and use Firebase's pre-built services for backend functionality. It provides limited options for server-side customization and requires reliance on Firebase's backend services for most functionalities.
Real-time Database: Firebase offers a real-time database as one of its core features. The real-time database allows developers to sync data in real-time across multiple clients and devices without writing complex server-side logic. It uses WebSockets to achieve real-time synchronization, providing instant updates and immediate responses to changes in data. In comparison, Backendless does not have a built-in real-time database feature. However, it supports real-time data integration through external APIs or services, which can be integrated into the app's backend logic.
Data Storage: Backendless and Firebase have different approaches to data storage. Backendless provides a unified data storage solution that seamlessly handles structured data, unstructured data, and files. It includes features like data import/export, search capabilities, and fine-grained data permissions. Firebase, on the other hand, offers a NoSQL cloud database for storing and syncing structured data. It provides automatic offline synchronization and supports security rules for data access control. However, Firebase does not have native support for file storage and requires integration with other services for file storage functionality.
Authentication and User Management: Backendless and Firebase have different approaches to authentication and user management. Backendless provides a comprehensive authentication system that supports multiple authentication methods like email/password, OAuth, and custom authentication providers. It includes features like user registration, login, password recovery, and roles/permissions management. Firebase also offers authentication services, but it primarily focuses on providing seamless authentication using popular social login providers like Google, Facebook, or Twitter. Firebase simplifies the authentication process but may have fewer customization options compared to Backendless.
Analytics and Reporting: Firebase provides robust analytics and reporting capabilities as part of its platform. It allows developers to track user behavior, app usage, and conversion events. Firebase analytics provides real-time insights, user segmentation, and funnel analysis for understanding app performance. Backendless also offers analytics and reporting features, but it may have fewer advanced capabilities compared to Firebase. Backendless focuses more on providing backend services and developer tools rather than extensive analytics and reporting functionalities.
In Summary, Backendless offers automatic scalability, flexible backend development options, and a unified data storage solution, while Firebase focuses on serverless architecture, provides a real-time database, and specializes in authentication and user management. Backendless provides more control and customization options, while Firebase simplifies development with pre-built services and seamless authentication.
We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.
I would recommend looking hard into Firebase
for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.
The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore
. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.
Node.js
Express
MongoDB
Socket.IO
and Apollo
are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.
Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React
application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase
is a great way to do that.
Hello Noam 👋,
I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.
Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase
Hey Noam,
I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.
Thanks, Ilya
Pros of Backendless
Pros of Firebase
- Realtime backend made easy371
- Fast and responsive270
- Easy setup242
- Real-time215
- JSON191
- Free134
- Backed by google128
- Angular adaptor83
- Reliable68
- Great customer support36
- Great documentation32
- Real-time synchronization25
- Mobile friendly21
- Rapid prototyping18
- Great security14
- Automatic scaling12
- Freakingly awesome11
- Chat8
- Angularfire is an amazing addition!8
- Super fast development8
- Built in user auth/oauth6
- Firebase hosting6
- Ios adaptor6
- Awesome next-gen backend6
- Speed of light4
- Very easy to use4
- Great3
- It's made development super fast3
- Brilliant for startups3
- Free hosting2
- Cloud functions2
- JS Offline and Sync suport2
- Low battery consumption2
- .net2
- The concurrent updates create a great experience2
- Push notification2
- I can quickly create static web apps with no backend2
- Great all-round functionality2
- Free authentication solution2
- Easy Reactjs integration1
- Google's support1
- Free SSL1
- CDN & cache out of the box1
- Easy to use1
- Large1
- Faster workflow1
- Serverless1
- Good Free Limits1
- Simple and easy1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Backendless
Cons of Firebase
- Can become expensive31
- No open source, you depend on external company16
- Scalability is not infinite15
- Not Flexible Enough9
- Cant filter queries7
- Very unstable server3
- No Relational Data3
- Too many errors2
- No offline sync2