Backendless vs Firebase

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Backendless

15
74
+ 1
0
Firebase

40.3K
34.6K
+ 1
2K
Add tool

Backendless vs Firebase: What are the differences?

  1. Scalability: One key difference between Backendless and Firebase is their scalability. Backendless offers automatic scaling of applications, meaning that as the app usage increases, the backend infrastructure automatically adjusts to handle the load. It can handle high traffic and large data sets without requiring manual intervention. On the other hand, Firebase also supports automatic scaling, but it has some limitations when it comes to handling large data sets or high traffic applications. It may require additional configuration or manual intervention to handle scalability issues.

  2. Backend Development: Another difference between Backendless and Firebase is the level of control in backend development. Backendless allows developers to write server-side code in various programming languages, giving them more flexibility and control over the backend logic. It also provides features like custom business logic, API services, and event-driven serverless functions. In contrast, Firebase mainly focuses on serverless architecture, where developers write client-side code and use Firebase's pre-built services for backend functionality. It provides limited options for server-side customization and requires reliance on Firebase's backend services for most functionalities.

  3. Real-time Database: Firebase offers a real-time database as one of its core features. The real-time database allows developers to sync data in real-time across multiple clients and devices without writing complex server-side logic. It uses WebSockets to achieve real-time synchronization, providing instant updates and immediate responses to changes in data. In comparison, Backendless does not have a built-in real-time database feature. However, it supports real-time data integration through external APIs or services, which can be integrated into the app's backend logic.

  4. Data Storage: Backendless and Firebase have different approaches to data storage. Backendless provides a unified data storage solution that seamlessly handles structured data, unstructured data, and files. It includes features like data import/export, search capabilities, and fine-grained data permissions. Firebase, on the other hand, offers a NoSQL cloud database for storing and syncing structured data. It provides automatic offline synchronization and supports security rules for data access control. However, Firebase does not have native support for file storage and requires integration with other services for file storage functionality.

  5. Authentication and User Management: Backendless and Firebase have different approaches to authentication and user management. Backendless provides a comprehensive authentication system that supports multiple authentication methods like email/password, OAuth, and custom authentication providers. It includes features like user registration, login, password recovery, and roles/permissions management. Firebase also offers authentication services, but it primarily focuses on providing seamless authentication using popular social login providers like Google, Facebook, or Twitter. Firebase simplifies the authentication process but may have fewer customization options compared to Backendless.

  6. Analytics and Reporting: Firebase provides robust analytics and reporting capabilities as part of its platform. It allows developers to track user behavior, app usage, and conversion events. Firebase analytics provides real-time insights, user segmentation, and funnel analysis for understanding app performance. Backendless also offers analytics and reporting features, but it may have fewer advanced capabilities compared to Firebase. Backendless focuses more on providing backend services and developer tools rather than extensive analytics and reporting functionalities.

In Summary, Backendless offers automatic scalability, flexible backend development options, and a unified data storage solution, while Firebase focuses on serverless architecture, provides a real-time database, and specializes in authentication and user management. Backendless provides more control and customization options, while Firebase simplifies development with pre-built services and seamless authentication.

Advice on Backendless and Firebase
Needs advice
on
ApolloApolloFirebaseFirebase
and
Socket.IOSocket.IO

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

See more
Replies (3)
Timothy Malstead
Junior Full Stack Developer at Freelance · | 7 upvotes · 468.8K views
Recommends
on
FirebaseFirebase

I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.

The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.

Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.

Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.

See more
Recommends
on
AblyAbly

Hello Noam 👋,

I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.

Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase

See more
Recommends
on
8base8base

Hey Noam,

I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.

Thanks, Ilya

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Backendless
Pros of Firebase
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 371
      Realtime backend made easy
    • 270
      Fast and responsive
    • 242
      Easy setup
    • 215
      Real-time
    • 191
      JSON
    • 134
      Free
    • 128
      Backed by google
    • 83
      Angular adaptor
    • 68
      Reliable
    • 36
      Great customer support
    • 32
      Great documentation
    • 25
      Real-time synchronization
    • 21
      Mobile friendly
    • 18
      Rapid prototyping
    • 14
      Great security
    • 12
      Automatic scaling
    • 11
      Freakingly awesome
    • 8
      Chat
    • 8
      Angularfire is an amazing addition!
    • 8
      Super fast development
    • 6
      Built in user auth/oauth
    • 6
      Firebase hosting
    • 6
      Ios adaptor
    • 6
      Awesome next-gen backend
    • 4
      Speed of light
    • 4
      Very easy to use
    • 3
      Great
    • 3
      It's made development super fast
    • 3
      Brilliant for startups
    • 2
      Free hosting
    • 2
      Cloud functions
    • 2
      JS Offline and Sync suport
    • 2
      Low battery consumption
    • 2
      .net
    • 2
      The concurrent updates create a great experience
    • 2
      Push notification
    • 2
      I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
    • 2
      Great all-round functionality
    • 2
      Free authentication solution
    • 1
      Easy Reactjs integration
    • 1
      Google's support
    • 1
      Free SSL
    • 1
      CDN & cache out of the box
    • 1
      Easy to use
    • 1
      Large
    • 1
      Faster workflow
    • 1
      Serverless
    • 1
      Good Free Limits
    • 1
      Simple and easy

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Backendless
    Cons of Firebase
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 31
        Can become expensive
      • 16
        No open source, you depend on external company
      • 15
        Scalability is not infinite
      • 9
        Not Flexible Enough
      • 7
        Cant filter queries
      • 3
        Very unstable server
      • 3
        No Relational Data
      • 2
        Too many errors
      • 2
        No offline sync

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Backendless?

      It is a development and runtime platform which simplifies and shortens mobile application development process. The platform removes the need to develop backend functionality by providing reusable server-side services via APIs. The APIs are packaged into native libraries available for all major client-side environments - Andoid, iOS, JavaScript, .NET, ActionScript and REST. The default backend logic can be modified with custom server-side code. The platform is available as an online service and a downloadable Enterprise product which can be deployed in any environment.

      What is Firebase?

      Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Backendless?
      What companies use Firebase?
        No companies found
        See which teams inside your own company are using Backendless or Firebase.
        Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Backendless?
        What tools integrate with Firebase?
          No integrations found

          Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

          Blog Posts

          GitNode.jsFirebase+5
          7
          2370
          What are some alternatives to Backendless and Firebase?
          Kinvey
          Kinvey makes it ridiculously easy for developers to setup, use and operate a cloud backend for their mobile apps. They don't have to worry about connecting to various cloud services, setting up servers for their backend, or maintaining and scaling them.
          Parse
          With Parse, you can add a scalable and powerful backend in minutes and launch a full-featured app in record time without ever worrying about server management. We offer push notifications, social integration, data storage, and the ability to add rich custom logic to your app’s backend with Cloud Code.
          Back4App
          Back4app accelerates backend development, improves development productivity, reduces time to market, and let you scale applications without managing infrastructure.
          JavaScript
          JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
          Git
          Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
          See all alternatives