Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Hadoop vs IBM DB2: What are the differences?
Introduction
Hadoop and IBM DB2 are both popular technologies used in the field of data storage and processing, but they have several key differences that set them apart from each other.
Architecture: Hadoop is an open-source framework that utilizes a distributed file system and a MapReduce processing model to handle big data. On the other hand, IBM DB2 is a proprietary, relational database management system (RDBMS) that follows a traditional centralized architecture.
Data Processing: Hadoop is designed to handle unstructured and semi-structured data efficiently. It provides a scalable and fault-tolerant platform for processing large volumes of data in parallel. In contrast, IBM DB2 is optimized for structured data processing and offers various relational database management features, such as indexing, querying, and transaction handling.
Scalability: Hadoop is highly scalable and can easily handle petabytes of data by adding more commodity hardware to the cluster. It provides a distributed computing environment, allowing data processing to be spread across multiple nodes. In comparison, IBM DB2's scalability is limited by the capacity of a single server instance, making it more suitable for smaller to medium-sized datasets.
Data Storage: Hadoop uses a distributed file system called HDFS (Hadoop Distributed File System) for storing data across multiple machines in a cluster. This enables fault tolerance and high availability. In contrast, IBM DB2 stores data in a structured manner using tables, indexes, and other database objects within a single server instance.
Processing Speed: Hadoop excels at processing large volumes of data by distributing the workload across a cluster of machines. It can leverage parallel processing and perform computations in a distributed manner, leading to faster processing times for big data tasks. IBM DB2, being a traditional RDBMS, is optimized for transaction processing and handling structured data efficiently.
Cost: Hadoop is an open-source framework and allows organizations to utilize commodity hardware, resulting in a lower total cost of ownership. Conversely, IBM DB2 is a proprietary technology and typically involves licensing costs, making it comparatively more expensive.
In summary, Hadoop is an open-source, distributed framework suited for processing big data with its scalability, fault tolerance, and parallel processing capabilities. In contrast, IBM DB2 is a proprietary relational database management system optimized for structured data processing and transaction handling.
For a property and casualty insurance company, we currently use MarkLogic and Hadoop for our raw data lake. Trying to figure out how snowflake fits in the picture. Does anybody have some good suggestions/best practices for when to use and what data to store in Mark logic versus Snowflake versus a hadoop or all three of these platforms redundant with one another?
for property and casualty insurance company we current Use marklogic and Hadoop for our raw data lake. Trying to figure out how snowflake fits in the picture. Does anybody have some good suggestions/best practices for when to use and what data to store in Mark logic versus snowflake versus a hadoop or all three of these platforms redundant with one another?
As i see it, you can use Snowflake as your data warehouse and marklogic as a data lake. You can add all your raw data to ML and curate it to a company data model to then supply this to Snowflake. You could try to implement the dw functionality on marklogic but it will just cost you alot of time. If you are using Aws version of Snowflake you can use ML spark connector to access the data. As an extra you can use the ML also as an Operational report system if you join it with a Reporting tool lie PowerBi. With extra apis you can also provide data to other systems with ML as source.
I have a lot of data that's currently sitting in a MariaDB database, a lot of tables that weigh 200gb with indexes. Most of the large tables have a date column which is always filtered, but there are usually 4-6 additional columns that are filtered and used for statistics. I'm trying to figure out the best tool for storing and analyzing large amounts of data. Preferably self-hosted or a cheap solution. The current problem I'm running into is speed. Even with pretty good indexes, if I'm trying to load a large dataset, it's pretty slow.
Druid Could be an amazing solution for your use case, My understanding, and the assumption is you are looking to export your data from MariaDB for Analytical workload. It can be used for time series database as well as a data warehouse and can be scaled horizontally once your data increases. It's pretty easy to set up on any environment (Cloud, Kubernetes, or Self-hosted nix system). Some important features which make it a perfect solution for your use case. 1. It can do streaming ingestion (Kafka, Kinesis) as well as batch ingestion (Files from Local & Cloud Storage or Databases like MySQL, Postgres). In your case MariaDB (which has the same drivers to MySQL) 2. Columnar Database, So you can query just the fields which are required, and that runs your query faster automatically. 3. Druid intelligently partitions data based on time and time-based queries are significantly faster than traditional databases. 4. Scale up or down by just adding or removing servers, and Druid automatically rebalances. Fault-tolerant architecture routes around server failures 5. Gives ana amazing centralized UI to manage data sources, query, tasks.
Pros of IBM DB2
- Rock solid and very scalable7
- BLU Analytics is amazingly fast5
- Native XML support2
- Secure by default2
- Easy2
- Best performance1
Pros of Hadoop
- Great ecosystem39
- One stack to rule them all11
- Great load balancer4
- Amazon aws1
- Java syntax1