Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
TokuMX vs FaunaDB: What are the differences?
TokuMX: A high-performance, concurrent, compressing, drop-in replacement engine for MongoDB. TokuMX is a drop-in replacement for MongoDB, and offers 20X performance improvements, 90% reduction in database size, and support for ACID transactions with MVCC. TokuMX has the same binaries, supports the same drivers, data model, and features of MongoDB, because it shares much of its code with MongoDB; FaunaDB: The database built for serverless, featuring native GraphQL. FaunaDB is a global serverless database that gives you ubiquitous, low latency access to app data, without sacrificing data correctness and scale. It eliminates layers of app code for manually handling data anomalies, security, and scale, creating a friendlier dev experience for you and better app experience for your users.
TokuMX and FaunaDB can be categorized as "Databases" tools.
TokuMX is an open source tool with 682 GitHub stars and 91 GitHub forks. Here's a link to TokuMX's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Fauna
- 100% ACID5
- Generous free tier4
- Removes server provisioning or maintenance4
- Low latency global CDN's3
- No more n+1 problems (+ GraphQL)3
- Works well with GraphQL3
- Also supports SQL, CQL3
- No ORM layer needed2
Pros of TokuMX
- When your two-week MongoDB love affair ends, try this3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Fauna
- Susceptible to DDoS (& others) use timeouts throttling1
- Must keep app secrets encrypted1
- Log stack traces to avoid improper exception handling1
