Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Firebase vs Flurry: What are the differences?
Introduction
Firebase and Flurry are both popular mobile analytics platforms used by developers to measure app performance and gather user insights. However, they have some key differences that set them apart. Let's take a look at six major differences between Firebase and Flurry.
1. Data Integration: Firebase offers seamless integration with other Google services, making it easier to use and analyze data from multiple sources. In contrast, Flurry doesn't have the same level of integration with other platforms, limiting its ability to collect and leverage data from various sources.
2. Real-time Analytics: Firebase provides real-time analytics, allowing developers to monitor user behavior and app performance instantly. On the other hand, Flurry provides delayed analytics, which means developers have to wait before getting the latest data insights.
3. Pricing Structure: Firebase has a more flexible and transparent pricing structure, allowing developers to choose from a range of plans based on their specific needs and budget. Flurry, on the other hand, has a less flexible pricing model with limited options, making it less suitable for developers with varying requirements.
4. Push Notifications: Firebase offers a robust push notification system that allows developers to send targeted messages to their app users. Flurry, on the other hand, doesn't have the same level of capability in terms of push notifications.
5. User Segmentation and Targeting: Firebase provides advanced user segmentation features that allow developers to create specific user groups based on various criteria. This enables developers to target specific user segments with personalized messaging and content. Flurry, on the other hand, has limited user segmentation capabilities, making it less effective for targeted marketing campaigns.
6. App Performance Monitoring: Firebase includes App Performance Monitoring, a feature that provides detailed insights into app crashes, app start times, and network latency. Flurry, on the other hand, doesn't provide such in-depth app performance monitoring, limiting the ability to identify and fix performance issues.
In summary, Firebase has a more robust and integrated platform with real-time analytics, flexible pricing, push notification capabilities, advanced user segmentation, and in-depth app performance monitoring. Meanwhile, Flurry falls short in these areas and is better suited for simpler analytics needs.
We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.
I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.
The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.
Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.
Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.
Hello Noam 👋,
I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.
Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase
Hey Noam,
I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.
Thanks, Ilya
Pros of Firebase
- Realtime backend made easy371
- Fast and responsive270
- Easy setup242
- Real-time215
- JSON191
- Free134
- Backed by google128
- Angular adaptor83
- Reliable68
- Great customer support36
- Great documentation32
- Real-time synchronization25
- Mobile friendly21
- Rapid prototyping18
- Great security14
- Automatic scaling12
- Freakingly awesome11
- Chat8
- Angularfire is an amazing addition!8
- Super fast development8
- Built in user auth/oauth6
- Firebase hosting6
- Ios adaptor6
- Awesome next-gen backend6
- Speed of light4
- Very easy to use4
- Great3
- It's made development super fast3
- Brilliant for startups3
- Free hosting2
- Cloud functions2
- JS Offline and Sync suport2
- Low battery consumption2
- .net2
- The concurrent updates create a great experience2
- Push notification2
- I can quickly create static web apps with no backend2
- Great all-round functionality2
- Free authentication solution2
- Easy Reactjs integration1
- Google's support1
- Free SSL1
- CDN & cache out of the box1
- Easy to use1
- Large1
- Faster workflow1
- Serverless1
- Good Free Limits1
- Simple and easy1
Pros of Flurry
- Most complete and developer/marketing friendly metrics6
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Firebase
- Can become expensive31
- No open source, you depend on external company16
- Scalability is not infinite15
- Not Flexible Enough9
- Cant filter queries7
- Very unstable server3
- No Relational Data3
- Too many errors2
- No offline sync2
Cons of Flurry
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Firebase?
What is Flurry?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Flurry?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+5