Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jest

9.4K
3.9K
+ 1
175
Majestic GUI

2
13
+ 1
0
Add tool

Jest vs Majestic GUI: What are the differences?

  1. Key difference 1: Integration vs Standalone: Jest is a JavaScript testing framework that can be integrated with various tools and libraries like React, Vue, and Angular. In contrast, Majestic GUI is a standalone graphical user interface specifically designed for running Jest tests. While Jest provides flexibility to be used in different environments, Majestic GUI offers a dedicated interface for managing Jest tests.
  2. Key difference 2: User Interface: Jest mainly operates through a command-line interface (CLI), which requires developers to manually enter commands to execute tests. On the other hand, Majestic GUI provides a graphical user interface (GUI) that allows users to interact with Jest tests through a visual interface. This makes it more user-friendly and intuitive for developers who prefer a visual experience.
  3. Key difference 3: Features: Both Jest and Majestic GUI provide similar features for testing JavaScript applications, such as test execution, test coverage analysis, and test result reporting. However, Majestic GUI offers additional features like test filtering, test grouping, and real-time feedback, which enhance the testing experience and improve efficiency for developers.
  4. Key difference 4: Configuration: In terms of configuration, Jest relies on a configuration file (usually named jest.config.js), where developers can customize various testing settings. On the other hand, Majestic GUI provides a simpler approach by offering a graphical interface to configure testing options without the need to modify a configuration file directly. This makes it more convenient for developers who prefer a visual-based configuration process.
  5. Key difference 5: Collaboration: When it comes to collaboration, Jest is more suitable for collaborative development environments where multiple developers work together on a project. It provides features like snapshot testing and mocking, which facilitate test writing and sharing among team members. Majestic GUI, on the other hand, is more focused on individual developers or small teams, providing a seamless testing experience without the need for extensive collaboration features.
  6. Key difference 6: Learning curve: Jest, being a command-line based testing framework, has a relatively steeper learning curve compared to Majestic GUI. Developers need to familiarize themselves with CLI commands and configurations to effectively use Jest. In contrast, Majestic GUI simplifies the testing process by providing a visual interface, reducing the learning curve and making it more accessible for beginners or developers with limited command-line experience.

In Summary, Jest is a versatile testing framework that can be integrated with various tools, providing flexibility and features for collaboration, while Majestic GUI is a user-friendly standalone graphical interface dedicated to running Jest tests, offering a simplified testing experience with additional features and reduced learning curve.

Decisions about Jest and Majestic GUI
Shared insights
on
CypressCypressJestJest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

See more

Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Jest
Pros of Majestic GUI
  • 36
    Open source
  • 32
    Mock by default makes testing much simpler
  • 23
    Testing React Native Apps
  • 20
    Parallel test running
  • 16
    Fast
  • 13
    Bundled with JSDOM to enable DOM testing
  • 8
    Mock by default screws up your classes, breaking tests
  • 7
    Out of the box code coverage
  • 7
    Promise support
  • 6
    One stop shop for unit testing
  • 3
    Great documentation
  • 2
    Assert Library Included
  • 1
    Built in watch option with interactive filtering menu
  • 1
    Preset support
  • 0
    Can be used for BDD
  • 0
    Karma
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Jest
    Cons of Majestic GUI
    • 4
      Documentation
    • 4
      Ambiguous configuration
    • 3
      Difficult
    • 2
      Many bugs still not fixed months/years after reporting
    • 2
      Multiple error messages for same error
    • 2
      Difficult to run single test/describe/file
    • 2
      Ambiguous
    • 2
      Bugged
    • 1
      BeforeAll timing out makes all passing tests fail
    • 1
      Slow
    • 1
      Reporter is too general
    • 1
      Unstable
    • 1
      Bad docs
    • 1
      Still does't support .mjs files natively
    • 1
      Can't fail beforeAll to abort tests
    • 0
      Interaction with watch mode on terminal
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Jest?

      Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

      What is Majestic GUI?

      A GUI for Jest that allows you to run all the tests or a single file, toggle watch mode, update snapshots, and much more.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Jest?
      What companies use Majestic GUI?
        No companies found
        See which teams inside your own company are using Jest or Majestic GUI.
        Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Jest?
        What tools integrate with Majestic GUI?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        Blog Posts

        What are some alternatives to Jest and Majestic GUI?
        Mocha
        Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.
        Selenium
        Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
        AVA
        Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.
        Enzyme
        Enzyme is a JavaScript Testing utility for React that makes it easier to assert, manipulate, and traverse your React Components' output.
        Jasmine
        Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.
        See all alternatives