Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jest vs Majestic GUI: What are the differences?
- Key difference 1: Integration vs Standalone: Jest is a JavaScript testing framework that can be integrated with various tools and libraries like React, Vue, and Angular. In contrast, Majestic GUI is a standalone graphical user interface specifically designed for running Jest tests. While Jest provides flexibility to be used in different environments, Majestic GUI offers a dedicated interface for managing Jest tests.
- Key difference 2: User Interface: Jest mainly operates through a command-line interface (CLI), which requires developers to manually enter commands to execute tests. On the other hand, Majestic GUI provides a graphical user interface (GUI) that allows users to interact with Jest tests through a visual interface. This makes it more user-friendly and intuitive for developers who prefer a visual experience.
- Key difference 3: Features: Both Jest and Majestic GUI provide similar features for testing JavaScript applications, such as test execution, test coverage analysis, and test result reporting. However, Majestic GUI offers additional features like test filtering, test grouping, and real-time feedback, which enhance the testing experience and improve efficiency for developers.
-
Key difference 4: Configuration: In terms of configuration, Jest relies on a configuration file (usually named
jest.config.js
), where developers can customize various testing settings. On the other hand, Majestic GUI provides a simpler approach by offering a graphical interface to configure testing options without the need to modify a configuration file directly. This makes it more convenient for developers who prefer a visual-based configuration process. - Key difference 5: Collaboration: When it comes to collaboration, Jest is more suitable for collaborative development environments where multiple developers work together on a project. It provides features like snapshot testing and mocking, which facilitate test writing and sharing among team members. Majestic GUI, on the other hand, is more focused on individual developers or small teams, providing a seamless testing experience without the need for extensive collaboration features.
- Key difference 6: Learning curve: Jest, being a command-line based testing framework, has a relatively steeper learning curve compared to Majestic GUI. Developers need to familiarize themselves with CLI commands and configurations to effectively use Jest. In contrast, Majestic GUI simplifies the testing process by providing a visual interface, reducing the learning curve and making it more accessible for beginners or developers with limited command-line experience.
In Summary, Jest is a versatile testing framework that can be integrated with various tools, providing flexibility and features for collaboration, while Majestic GUI is a user-friendly standalone graphical interface dedicated to running Jest tests, offering a simplified testing experience with additional features and reduced learning curve.
As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.
Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.
Pros of Jest
- Open source36
- Mock by default makes testing much simpler32
- Testing React Native Apps23
- Parallel test running20
- Fast16
- Bundled with JSDOM to enable DOM testing13
- Mock by default screws up your classes, breaking tests8
- Out of the box code coverage7
- Promise support7
- One stop shop for unit testing6
- Great documentation3
- Assert Library Included2
- Built in watch option with interactive filtering menu1
- Preset support1
- Can be used for BDD0
- Karma0
Pros of Majestic GUI
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Jest
- Documentation4
- Ambiguous configuration4
- Difficult3
- Many bugs still not fixed months/years after reporting2
- Multiple error messages for same error2
- Difficult to run single test/describe/file2
- Ambiguous2
- Bugged2
- BeforeAll timing out makes all passing tests fail1
- Slow1
- Reporter is too general1
- Unstable1
- Bad docs1
- Still does't support .mjs files natively1
- Can't fail beforeAll to abort tests1
- Interaction with watch mode on terminal0