Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
New Relic vs SpeedCurve: What are the differences?
Monitoring Focus: New Relic primarily focuses on application performance monitoring, providing deep insights into code-level issues, server performance, and database queries. On the other hand, SpeedCurve primarily focuses on web performance monitoring, emphasizing front-end performance metrics like page speed, resource loading times, and user experience.
Data Visualization: New Relic offers detailed and customizable dashboards with a comprehensive range of visualization options such as charts, graphs, and data tables. In contrast, SpeedCurve provides visually appealing synthetic and real user monitoring reports that focus on performance trends over time, aiding in quick decision-making for performance improvements.
Alerting Capabilities: New Relic offers robust alerting capabilities that notify users in real-time based on customizable thresholds for various performance metrics. SpeedCurve also provides alerting features but is more focused on alerting based on the impact on user experience metrics like site speed and user interactions.
Integrations: New Relic has a wide range of integrations with popular DevOps and IT tools such as Slack, PagerDuty, and JIRA, enabling seamless workflow automation and collaboration. SpeedCurve integrates with tools like Google Lighthouse and WebPageTest for in-depth performance analysis and offers API integration for custom workflows.
User Segmentation: New Relic allows for segmentation of application performance data based on various attributes like user location, device type, and browser, providing insights into user-specific performance issues. SpeedCurve offers user segmentation based on similar factors but with a primary focus on how different user segments experience web performance to prioritize optimization efforts.
Cost Structure: New Relic's pricing is typically based on the number of hosts or applications being monitored, making it suitable for businesses of all sizes. SpeedCurve's pricing is based on the number of monitor credits or sites being monitored, offering flexibility for organizations with varying levels of web properties.
In Summary, New Relic focuses on application performance monitoring with detailed data visualization and alerting capabilities, while SpeedCurve specializes in web performance monitoring, providing insights on front-end performance metrics, user experience impacts, and optimized cost structure.
We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.
We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.
We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.
You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?
Can't say anything to Sysdig. I clearly prefer Datadog as
- they provide plenty of easy to "switch-on" plugins for various technologies (incl. most of AWS)
- easy to code (python) agent plugins / api for own metrics
- brillant dashboarding / alarms with many customization options
- pricing is OK, there are cheaper options for specific use cases but if you want superior dashboarding / alarms I haven't seen a good competitor (despite your own Prometheus / Grafana / Kibana dog food)
IMHO NewRelic is "promising since years" ;) good ideas but bad integration between their products. Their Dashboard query language is really nice but lacks critical functions like multiple data sets or advanced calculations. Needless to say you get all of that with Datadog.
Need help setting up a monitoring / logging / alarm infrastructure? Send me a message!
Hi Medeti,
you are right. Building based on your stack something with open source is heavy lifting. A lot of people I know start with such a set-up, but quickly run into frustration as they need to dedicated their best people to build a monitoring which is doing the job in a professional way.
As you are microservice focussed and are looking for 'low implementation and maintenance effort', you might want to have a look at INSTANA, which was built with modern tool stacks in mind. https://www.instana.com/apm-for-microservices/
We have a public sand-box available if you just want to have a look at the product once and of course also a free-trial: https://www.instana.com/getting-started-with-apm/
Let me know if you need anything on top.
I have hands on production experience both with New Relic and Datadog. I personally prefer Datadog over NewRelic because of the UI, the Documentation and the overall user/developer experience.
NewRelic however, can do basically the same things as Datadog can, and some of the features like alerting have been present in NewRelic for longer than in Datadog. The cool thing about NewRelic is their last-summer-updated pricing: you no longer pay per host but after data you send towards New Relic. This can be a huge cost saver depending on your particular setup
I'd go for Datadog, but given you have lots of containers I would also make a cost calculation. If the price difference is significant and there's a budget constraint NewRelic might be the better choice.
I haven't heard much about Datadog until about a year ago. Ironically, the NewRelic sales person who I had a series of trainings with was trash talking about Datadog a lot. That drew my attention to Datadog and I gave it a try at another client project where we needed log handling, dashboards and alerting.
In 2019, Datadog was already offering log management and from that perspective, it was ahead of NewRelic. Other than that, from my perspective, the two tools are offering a very-very similar set of tools. Therefore I wouldn't say there's a significant difference between the two, the decision is likely a matter of taste. The pricing is also very similar.
The reasons why we chose Datadog over NewRelic were:
- The presence of log handling feature (since then, logging is GA at NewRelic as well since falls 2019).
- The setup was easier even though I already had experience with NewRelic, including participation in NewRelic trainings.
- The UI of Datadog is more compact and my experience is smoother.
- The NewRelic UI is very fragmented and New Relic One is just increasing this experience for me.
- The log feature of Datadog is very well designed, I find very useful the tagging logs with services. The log filtering is also very awesome.
Bottom line is that both tools are great and it makes sense to discover both and making the decision based on your use case. In our case, Datadog was the clear winner due to its UI, ease of setup and the awesome logging and alerting features.
I chose Datadog APM because the much better APM insights it provides (flamegraph, percentiles by default).
The drawbacks of this decision are we had to move our production monitoring to TimescaleDB + Telegraf instead of NR Insight
NewRelic is definitely easier when starting out. Agent is only a lib and doesn't require a daemon
Pros of New Relic
- Easy setup415
- Really powerful344
- Awesome visualization245
- Ease of use194
- Great ui151
- Free tier107
- Great tool for insights80
- Heroku Integration66
- Market leader55
- Peace of mind49
- Push notifications21
- Email notifications20
- Heroku Add-on17
- Error Detection and Alerting16
- Multiple language support13
- Server Resources Monitoring11
- SQL Analysis11
- Transaction Tracing9
- Azure Add-on8
- Apdex Scores8
- Analysis of CPU, Disk, Memory, and Network7
- Detailed reports7
- Application Response Times6
- Error Analysis6
- Performance of External Services6
- Application Availability Monitoring and Alerting6
- JVM Performance Analyzer (Java)5
- Most Time Consuming Transactions5
- Top Database Operations4
- Browser Transaction Tracing4
- Easy to use4
- Application Map3
- Weekly Performance Email3
- Pagoda Box integration3
- Custom Dashboards3
- Easy to setup2
- App Speed Index2
- Background Jobs Transaction Analysis2
- Real User Monitoring Analysis and Breakdown1
- Incident Detection and Alerting1
- Team Collaboration Tools1
- Metric Data Retention1
- Metric Data Resolution1
- Worst Transactions by User Dissatisfaction1
- Real User Monitoring Overview1
- Free1
- Time Comparisons1
- Access to Performance Data API1
- Best of the best, what more can you ask for1
- Best monitoring on the market1
- Rails integration1
- Super Expensive1
- Proce0
- Exceptions0
- Price0
- Cost0
Pros of SpeedCurve
- Easy setup2
- Understandable reports and great benchmark1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of New Relic
- Pricing model doesn't suit microservices20
- UI isn't great10
- Expensive7
- Visualizations aren't very helpful7
- Hard to understand why things in your app are breaking5
Cons of SpeedCurve
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is New Relic?
What is SpeedCurve?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use New Relic?
What companies use SpeedCurve?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with New Relic?
What tools integrate with SpeedCurve?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+8
+25
+39
+43
+26+33+25
+39